----quote-------------------------
Seeds: 0 of 2 connected (17 in swarm)
Peers: 70 of 21299 (37484 in swarm)
WTF?
17 seeders and 37484 peers.
Is that in any way normal?
----------------------------------
for a new axxo release, yes that is normal. People need to be a peer before they are a seeder. many people start downloading axxo movies on rss and start within minutes of it being released.
----quote-------------------------
more than 9k seeds and only one is online!!!!!!!!!
wtf?
----------------------------------
you dont understand what your bit torrent client is telling you. If there are 9k seeders, and you have connections to one of them, that just means the other 8999 are full up on connections for now. You will get to connect to them when it is your turn.
A private tracker can do whatever they want. Demonoid is probably the largest private tracker out there, and they have aXXo torrents.
Just because a tracker is private it does not mean by default that they will have higher quality download, faster downloads, or safer downloads. A lot of people don't understand this.
I agree that the x/h264 rips which are usually 720p are really high quality, but they are in a class of their own. They are always over 1gig in size, and some times up to 8 gigs.
Also, fake torrents don't apply here when we look at verified releases and make sure to check aXXo's name is in red on mininova.
Keep in mind, I don't take issue with you posting the nfo of each torrent, but when you added additional comments like
"SEMMS FxM Rip's Better.
In Audio Bitrate as well as Video Resolution.
Aks.X"
I just felt I needed to raise the issue that it isn't always bitrate and resolution when looking at the quality of the 700/800 meg releases. So I posted what I found to be true based on my viewing of the different rippers on different mediums (from a 22" monitor to a 52" tv)
And yes, I know they are all on the same team. Competition is a good thing. It is how we avoid situations like microsoft, or telecommunications conglomerates. I like that I can look to FXG if aXXo hasn;t released somthing (like Religulous)
I agree that the x/h264 rips which are usually 720p are really high quality, but they are in a class of their own. They are always over 1gig in size, and some times up to 8 gigs.
Also, fake torrents don't apply here when we look at verified releases and make sure to check aXXo's name is in red on mininova.
Keep in mind, I don't take issue with you posting the nfo of each torrent, but when you added additional comments like
"SEMMS FxM Rip's Better.
In Audio Bitrate as well as Video Resolution.
Aks.X"
I just felt I needed to raise the issue that it isn't always bitrate and resolution when looking at the quality of the 700/800 meg releases. So I posted what I found to be true based on my viewing of the different rippers on different mediums (from a 22" monitor to a 52" tv)
And yes, I know they are all on the same team. Competition is a good thing. It is how we avoid situations like microsoft, or telecommunications conglomerates. I like that I can look to FXG if aXXo hasn;t released somthing (like Religulous)
I understand that not everybody can download both copies to compare them, and like you, I am suggesting what is in my opinion the higher quality download.
You point out that the releases from FXG have higher bit rates and sample rates. I don't deny that FXG often will be a higher resolution, with a higher bit rate.
That screen shot I took was from a random point in a movie that I had happened to download both copies for.
My opinion, and this is based on many movies from aXXo, FXG, FQM or whoever the other one is (I dont remember what KLAXXON is like, i dont think i ever downloaded his) The black will always look more like a true black in an aXXo rip. You see fewer artifacts in the aXXo rips because of his ability to get rips with such amazing colour saturation. A lot of times these movies really show their weaknesses when there is a monochromatic or dark scene. aXXo movies always stay true.
So again, for all you people who cannot download more than one copy: I would suggest getting the aXXo version, not because it is higher resolution, but because it simply looks better. The plus side is you get to download a smaller file :D
I understand that not everybody can download both copies to compare them, and like you, I am suggesting what is in my opinion the higher quality download.
You point out that the releases from FXG have higher bit rates and sample rates. I don't deny that FXG often will be a higher resolution, with a higher bit rate.
That screen shot I took was from a random point in a movie that I had happened to download both copies for.
My opinion, and this is based on many movies from aXXo, FXG, FQM or whoever the other one is (I dont remember what KLAXXON is like, i dont think i ever downloaded his) The black will always look more like a true black in an aXXo rip. You see fewer artifacts in the aXXo rips because of his ability to get rips with such amazing colour saturation. A lot of times these movies really show their weaknesses when there is a monochromatic or dark scene. aXXo movies always stay true.
So again, for all you people who cannot download more than one copy: I would suggest getting the aXXo version, not because it is higher resolution, but because it simply looks better. The plus side is you get to download a smaller file :D
the fxg rip was 100 megs larger, and you can see it in the sharpness... however the colour in the aXXo version is much nicer in my opinion... and thats why I will always choose his first. When the movie is rolling, the pixels wont show, but colour, contrast, hue and saturation always will.
the fxg rip was 100 megs larger, and you can see it in the sharpness... however the colour in the aXXo version is much nicer in my opinion... and thats why I will always choose his first. When the movie is rolling, the pixels wont show, but colour, contrast, hue and saturation always will.
the fxg rip was 100 megs larger, and you can see it in the sharpness... however the colour in the aXXo version is much nicer in my opinion... and thats why I will always choose his first. When the movie is rolling, the pixels wont show, but colour, contrast, hue and saturation always will.
the fxg rip was 100 megs larger, and you can see it in the sharpness... however the colour in the aXXo version is much nicer in my opinion... and thats why I will always choose his first. When the movie is rolling, the pixels wont show, but colour always does.
aakash_sin, just so you know bit rates only talk about the amount of information, not the quality of the information to the human eye.
Also, FxM's rip is 100 megs larger, so it can fit that extra information. The resolution difference will not be noticable.
I choose aXXo torrents whenever possible because to me they seem to be higher visual quality. The area I notice this the most is in the blacks. Other rippers, while they have great quality, never seem to get the dark areas the same as aXXo. In aXXo rips the black is essentially the same darkness as the black "frame" at the top and bottom.
To me, it is in these dark scenes that it is easiest to see the lack of quality of an encode, so I really appreciate aXXo's work.
I can watch aXXo rips on my Samsung 52" LCD, and not be distracted by quality issues.
chavoc's Comments (15) / Joined 1 year ago / Karma: 14
Seeds: 0 of 2 connected (17 in swarm)
Peers: 70 of 21299 (37484 in swarm)
WTF?
17 seeders and 37484 peers.
Is that in any way normal?
----------------------------------
for a new axxo release, yes that is normal. People need to be a peer before they are a seeder. many people start downloading axxo movies on rss and start within minutes of it being released.
----quote-------------------------
more than 9k seeds and only one is online!!!!!!!!!
wtf?
----------------------------------
you dont understand what your bit torrent client is telling you. If there are 9k seeders, and you have connections to one of them, that just means the other 8999 are full up on connections for now. You will get to connect to them when it is your turn.
A private tracker can do whatever they want. Demonoid is probably the largest private tracker out there, and they have aXXo torrents.
Just because a tracker is private it does not mean by default that they will have higher quality download, faster downloads, or safer downloads. A lot of people don't understand this.
Also, fake torrents don't apply here when we look at verified releases and make sure to check aXXo's name is in red on mininova.
Keep in mind, I don't take issue with you posting the nfo of each torrent, but when you added additional comments like
"SEMMS FxM Rip's Better.
In Audio Bitrate as well as Video Resolution.
Aks.X"
I just felt I needed to raise the issue that it isn't always bitrate and resolution when looking at the quality of the 700/800 meg releases. So I posted what I found to be true based on my viewing of the different rippers on different mediums (from a 22" monitor to a 52" tv)
And yes, I know they are all on the same team. Competition is a good thing. It is how we avoid situations like microsoft, or telecommunications conglomerates. I like that I can look to FXG if aXXo hasn;t released somthing (like Religulous)
Thanks for the civil conversation
Also, fake torrents don't apply here when we look at verified releases and make sure to check aXXo's name is in red on mininova.
Keep in mind, I don't take issue with you posting the nfo of each torrent, but when you added additional comments like
"SEMMS FxM Rip's Better.
In Audio Bitrate as well as Video Resolution.
Aks.X"
I just felt I needed to raise the issue that it isn't always bitrate and resolution when looking at the quality of the 700/800 meg releases. So I posted what I found to be true based on my viewing of the different rippers on different mediums (from a 22" monitor to a 52" tv)
And yes, I know they are all on the same team. Competition is a good thing. It is how we avoid situations like microsoft, or telecommunications conglomerates. I like that I can look to FXG if aXXo hasn;t released somthing (like Religulous)
Thanks for the civil conversation
I understand that not everybody can download both copies to compare them, and like you, I am suggesting what is in my opinion the higher quality download.
You point out that the releases from FXG have higher bit rates and sample rates. I don't deny that FXG often will be a higher resolution, with a higher bit rate.
That screen shot I took was from a random point in a movie that I had happened to download both copies for.
My opinion, and this is based on many movies from aXXo, FXG, FQM or whoever the other one is (I dont remember what KLAXXON is like, i dont think i ever downloaded his) The black will always look more like a true black in an aXXo rip. You see fewer artifacts in the aXXo rips because of his ability to get rips with such amazing colour saturation. A lot of times these movies really show their weaknesses when there is a monochromatic or dark scene. aXXo movies always stay true.
So again, for all you people who cannot download more than one copy: I would suggest getting the aXXo version, not because it is higher resolution, but because it simply looks better. The plus side is you get to download a smaller file :D
I understand that not everybody can download both copies to compare them, and like you, I am suggesting what is in my opinion the higher quality download.
You point out that the releases from FXG have higher bit rates and sample rates. I don't deny that FXG often will be a higher resolution, with a higher bit rate.
That screen shot I took was from a random point in a movie that I had happened to download both copies for.
My opinion, and this is based on many movies from aXXo, FXG, FQM or whoever the other one is (I dont remember what KLAXXON is like, i dont think i ever downloaded his) The black will always look more like a true black in an aXXo rip. You see fewer artifacts in the aXXo rips because of his ability to get rips with such amazing colour saturation. A lot of times these movies really show their weaknesses when there is a monochromatic or dark scene. aXXo movies always stay true.
So again, for all you people who cannot download more than one copy: I would suggest getting the aXXo version, not because it is higher resolution, but because it simply looks better. The plus side is you get to download a smaller file :D
http://img24.imageshack.us/img24/577/axxovsfxgnv2.png
the fxg rip was 100 megs larger, and you can see it in the sharpness... however the colour in the aXXo version is much nicer in my opinion... and thats why I will always choose his first. When the movie is rolling, the pixels wont show, but colour, contrast, hue and saturation always will.
http://img24.imageshack.us/img24/577/axxovsfxgnv2.png
the fxg rip was 100 megs larger, and you can see it in the sharpness... however the colour in the aXXo version is much nicer in my opinion... and thats why I will always choose his first. When the movie is rolling, the pixels wont show, but colour, contrast, hue and saturation always will.
http://img24.imageshack.us/img24/577/axxovsfxgnv2.png
the fxg rip was 100 megs larger, and you can see it in the sharpness... however the colour in the aXXo version is much nicer in my opinion... and thats why I will always choose his first. When the movie is rolling, the pixels wont show, but colour, contrast, hue and saturation always will.
http://img24.imageshack.us/img24/577/axxovsfxgnv2.png
the fxg rip was 100 megs larger, and you can see it in the sharpness... however the colour in the aXXo version is much nicer in my opinion... and thats why I will always choose his first. When the movie is rolling, the pixels wont show, but colour always does.
Also, FxM's rip is 100 megs larger, so it can fit that extra information. The resolution difference will not be noticable.
I choose aXXo torrents whenever possible because to me they seem to be higher visual quality. The area I notice this the most is in the blacks. Other rippers, while they have great quality, never seem to get the dark areas the same as aXXo. In aXXo rips the black is essentially the same darkness as the black "frame" at the top and bottom.
To me, it is in these dark scenes that it is easiest to see the lack of quality of an encode, so I really appreciate aXXo's work.
I can watch aXXo rips on my Samsung 52" LCD, and not be distracted by quality issues.
==============
ANY ONE WITH 64 BIT... YOU NEED THIS CRACK INSTEAD
==============
****